The interesting point that always comes up is what else is there instead of our dear friends. Therefore, animal experimentation should be stopped because it violates the rights of animals. This is around times more animals than the number used in scientific research.
In the Name of Science: Some people will say that that animals have not been as critical to medicine as is generally claimed. Those are clearly the optimal choices. Researchers working with animals carry out their experiments with extreme care to eliminate or minimise suffering. Animals can be given chemicals, or even be genetically engineered, to affect their growth rates.
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the US for commercial and scientific testing including mice, rats, fish, birds, guinea pig, farm animals, cats and dogs. Still other people think that animal testing is acceptable because animals are lower species than humans and therefore have no rights.
In another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done inside a test tube. Many animals go through screaming, unbearable, horrific; you cann Class 10 High School Add Animal Testing Essay Notes Please share any thoughts or ideas on improving this page.
Some Cons of animal testing are that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. New medical treatments are tested on animals to verify the toxicity of new medications or the safety of a product that will be used on humans.
It's an opportunity that must not be wasted. This excludes birds, rats, and mice bred by research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish.
Some primate researchers say these experiments can't be replaced with non-animal research methods, a claim refuted in a new report by members of the Focus on Alternatives coalition.
However, many people are concerned that animals are suffering unnecessarily and cruelly. More funding should be put into developing alternatives to experiments using animals. This helps to reduce side effects and human fatalities.
Experiments where dogs had their pancreases removed was the cause of the discovery of insulin, which is critical to saving the lives of diabetics. It was also instrumental in the development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics PRO Animal Testing.
Thus, because animals are subjected to agonizing pain, suffering and death when they are used in laboratory and cosmetics testing, animal research must be stopped to prevent more waste of animal life.
The process of using animals to test safety of food and medicines was One of the most debated topics of our times is whether we should use animals for experiments or not. InMinnesota used more cats than any other states (2,), New Jersey used the most dogs (6,), and Massachusetts used the most primates (7,) (Did You Know.
4). Some Pros of animal testing are that animal testing has contributed to many life- saving cures and treatments. Bekoff's most recent Op-Ed was "The Dog's Telltale Tail" This article was adapted from "'Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?" in Psychology Today.
The views expressed are. Animals are often used in experimentation of medical treatments and procedures, including testing levels of toxicity in medications, are used in biomedical testing, and for commercial product testing.
Yes, animal testing can be upsetting because many animals are used for experiments, but when thinking of the fact that animal testing helps develop treatments and save millions of people, animal testing does not sound that bad. Cosmetics Tests That Use Animals Animals are still used to assess the safety of cosmetics and personal care products — such as lipstick, mascara, shampoo, and cologne.
It's estimated thatmice, guinea pigs, rats, and rabbits suffer and die in these tests every year throughout the world. Debate whether or not animals should be used for testing. Do you think it is a humane way of handling things?Should animals be used for testing